Subject: Re: a sorting conundrum
From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 07:04:17 +1100
|
On 03 Mar 2005 19:54:28 +0000, Colin Paul Adams
<colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>> "Dimitre" == Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> Dimitre> If we want to have a more efficient variant of the above,
> Dimitre> which avoids the translate(), (and we assume an
> Dimitre> intelligent optimizer),
>
> Dimitre> then the following should be much more efficient:
>
> Dimitre> substring(., string-length(substring-before(.,' ')) +
> Dimitre> (string-length(substring-before(.,' ')) > 0) )
>
> You can remove that assumption of an intelligent optimizer, by placing
> the common sub-expression into a variable.
Not in this case -- it is not possible to have an xsl:variable as a
preceding-sibling of an xsl:sort.
Sorry.
Cheers,
Dimitre
|