Subject: Re: A sequence of more than one item is not allowed as the [nth] argument of [function]
From: Mukul Gandhi <mukul_gandhi@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 07:12:16 -0800 (PST)
|
Thanks Colin for your reply.. I also felt so.. I feel
this is appropriate! I'll just compare this with the
Windows example I gave.. If I am running my PC as
Windows 2000(similar to using Saxon 8.1), I cannot
expect it to function as *Windows 98 only m/c*..
Overall everything seems fine.. Afterall its agreed by
so many WG members..
Regards,
Mukul
--- Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>> "Mukul" == Mukul Gandhi
> <mukul_gandhi@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> Mukul> I have another question - If I am using a
> XSLT 2.0
> Mukul> processor (like Saxon 8.1), which
> provides backward
> Mukul> compatibility.. How can I ask Saxon 8.1
> to work as *XSLT
> Mukul> 1.0 only* processor?
>
> You can't.
> --
> Colin Paul Adams
> Preston Lancashire
>
>
__________________________________
Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday!
Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web
http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/
|