RE: [xsl] Is there a reason for not using XSLT 2.0 as a defa

Shopping cart

XML Editor - Download a Free Trial >

See What's New >

[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

Subject: RE: Is there a reason for not using XSLT 2.0 as a default
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 09:27:11 -0000

> Confused Michael. Yours, Colins and .....?
> 
> Whose is the third please?

XML Spy 2005

Michael Kay

Current Thread

RE: Is there a reason for not using XSLT 2.0 as a default, (continued)
- Michael Kay - 8 Mar 2005 21:00:31 -0000
- David Carlisle - 8 Mar 2005 21:33:10 -0000
- Pawson, David - 9 Mar 2005 08:46:37 -0000
  - M. David Peterson - 9 Mar 2005 09:05:53 -0000
  - Michael Kay - 9 Mar 2005 09:27:33 -0000 <=
- Michael Champion - 9 Mar 2005 16:03:17 -0000
  - Wendell Piez - 9 Mar 2005 17:39:49 -0000
- Pieter Reint Siegers Kort - 9 Mar 2005 16:23:50 -0000
- Andrew Welch - 9 Mar 2005 16:43:16 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: Is there a reason for not, M. David Peterson	Thread	Re: Is there a reason for not, Michael Champion
Re: Problem with grouping the, Olaf Meske	Date	RE: Is there a reason for not, Michael Kay
	Month

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks

W3C Member