Subject: Re: Node Position & Relationship!
From: António Mota <amsmota@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:04:26 +0000
|
But i want the $level to be the actual level, 0, 1, 2, ...
But since i'm not reached the optimization phase, i'll check if there
are cases when i really just wnat to check the first level, your
remark is a good point...
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 08:16:56 -0800 (PST), David Carlisle
<davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm doing it like this:
>
> <xsl:variable name="level" select="count(ancestor::Menu)"/>
> (...)
> <xsl:choose>
> <xsl:when test="$level=0">
> <xsl:text>1</xsl:text> ----> this node is visible
> </xsl:when>
>
> where Menu is your tree_node.
>
> that (probably) forces the system to really go all the way up the
> ancestor axis and count the number of nodes.
>
> If you just went
>
> <xsl:when test="not(ancestor::Menu)">1</xsl:when>
>
> then the system would only need to do the minimum amount of checking to
> see if there were any such ancestors.
>
> David
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
> service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
> anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
> http://www.star.net.uk
> ________________________________________________________________________
|