[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Quoting Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>:
So why not have two schemas from the XSLT 2.0 WG: the current one with all bells and whistles and a much simpler one that will be easily and immediately dropable in most of today's not so clever schema-oriented text editors? What is the intended purpose of the schema in current XSLT 2.0 Draft? Is it validation of stylesheets? Or is it providing a simple way to implement entry helpers for XML editors? Or feeding as an input for source generators (XML Data Binding)? There are numerous products which are great although the Schema support is not complete. Complete support is good of course, but mostly not the main focus of development. In my opinion a much simpler schema would be great. But it would be difficult to decide what to leave out. But the thing with complexContent inside a SimpleType might be a good candidat. ;)
|

Cart



