Subject: Re: Muenchian grouping
From: Mukul Gandhi <mukul_gandhi@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:06:09 -0800 (PST)
|
Thank you David for sharing this post. Its indeed a
URL to bookmark. I have done so!
Regards,
Mukul
--- David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > But we cannot undermine the importance of
> Muenchian grouping.
>
> Oh I didn't mean to undermine that.
> In fact I was one of the first to see that: SM
> mailed me (and MK I think,
> can't remember) outlining his idea to use keys for
> grouping just shortly before he
> mailed it to this list. One of the things that
> finally weaned me off xt
> (which didn't support keys)
>
>
>
> ah found SM's mail (Fri, 5 May 2000, originally sent
> to Michael Kay then
> forwarded by Steve to me as well)
>
> Not sure I should post other people's mail though,
> although an interesting
> historical record:-)
>
> Here's Steve's public posting a few days later
>
>
http://www.biglist.com/lists/xsl-list/archives/200005/msg00270.html
>
> David
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
|