Subject: RE: functions and sequences
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:58:21 -0000
|
> Actually, I meant:
>
> - Extend the definition of the concat() function, so that *each*
> of its (one or more)
> arguments is of type non-empty sequence of xs:string or non-empty
> sequence of text
> nodes.
We didn't do that because it would introduce backwards compatibility
problems.
concat(author, title, subject) in 1.0 gives you the first author and ignores
the rest.
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
|