Subject: Re: using step or following-sibling?
From: JBryant@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 16:36:06 -0600
|
Isn't row[1] short for row[position()=1]? Since he's trying to avoid the
position() function, isn't that a problem?
I'm curious: What issue do you have with the position function, Matt?
Jay Bryant
Bryant Communication Services
Geert Josten <Geert.Josten@xxxxxxxxxxx>
12/03/2004 04:21 PM
Please respond to
xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To
xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject
Re: using step or following-sibling?
<xsl:value-of select="following-sibling::row[1]/emp_nm" />
Cheers,
Geert
--
Geert.Josten@xxxxxxxxxxx
IT-consultant at Daidalos BV, Zoetermeer (NL)
http://www.daidalos.nl/
tel:+31-(0)79-3316961
fax:+31-(0)79-3316464
GPG: 1024D/12DEBB50
|