[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
G. Ken Holman wrote:
Mucho Gracias Ken! I will note this in my notebook of "references that may come in handy again some day" section :)
Yeah, the "2004-11-15" not being considered a number I knew, but without referencing the spec I was unsure of the exact nature of the number function and what the intended primary purpose was. ... which, BTW, doesn't compare true in any comparison with anything, including itself. Wait, are you refering to attember a cast to a number and then comparing? Obviously if compared to another string of equal value it would evaluate to true... or am I missing something that is important to understand in the comparison of this particular string?
It does, as always! Thanks Ken! <M:D/>
|

Cart



