Subject: RE: mathML2SVG
From: Bryan Rasmussen <bry@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 12:42:47 +0100
|
Well damn I'm also interested, especially as I was thinking about developing it
for myself anyway.
--
Bryan Rasmussen
Quoting Pieter Reint Siegers Kort <pieter.siegers@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Why not create a project on SF.net? All would be benefitted with that move,
> I think.
>
> Apart from that, did you also post your offer on the SVG list monitored by
> Kurt Gagle?
>
> A bit getting OT, but anyway, here it goes, for the good cause :-)
>
> Cheers,
> <prs/>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthew L. Avizinis [mailto:mla@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 9:39 AM
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: mathML2SVG
>
> I sent this yesterday, but apparently it failed. so here it is again
>
> ok, then. I'll put the stuff together. However, I think I'll let you
> folks
> peruse the code first before any other announcement -- there're probably a
> good number of defects or code that can be better written and additionally
> I'm a stinker when it comes to commentary, for the most part.
> Anyhow, is there a preferred method of posting here? some of the files are
> fairly long. should I just provide a bunch of http links to a set of files
> or should I post several messages here with the contents of each file
> included as text and notated where the start and end is for each file? In
> either case it will be Wednesday or Thursday before I'll have time to put
> it
> up. I hope nobody turns blue holding their breath... :) Finally, the
> reason I developed the thing was so that my company could better render
> equations/formulae in pdf format with FOP. Works for most cases we use
> around here.
> Matthew
>
> David Carlisle wrote:
>
> >> Anyone here interested in a set of templates that converts a fairly
> >>good subset of presentation mathML to SVG format using a fixed width
> >>font?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Me!
> >
> >you could announce on www-math@xxxxxx as well, and we could add a link
> >on the mathml software page at w3c.
> >
> >Copyright and licence issues: I'm not a lwayer as the saying goes, but
> >it's generally best to put something explicit in the file, GPL if you
> >are happy with that or perhaps the W3C's software licence which is
> >rather more easy going than GPL. See for example the licence comments
> >in the MathML stylesheets at http://www.w3.org/Math/XSL which are
> >copyright me, but licenced under the W3C licence (which means,
> >basically you can do what you want within reason)
> >
> >David
> >
> >_______________________________________________________________________
> >_ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
> >powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus
> >service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
> >http://www.star.net.uk
> >_______________________________________________________________________
> >_
|