Re: [xsl] alternative to FO?

Cart

XML Editor - Download a Free Trial >

See What's New >

Buy Now >

[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

Subject: Re: alternative to FO?
From: Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 16:49:01 -0500

On Nov 25, 2004, at 4:25 PM, Jirka Kosek wrote:

It might be option for some users who don't want care about FO or TeX and have not very demanding rendering requirements.

"Not very demanding rendering requirements" in what sense?

It's an innocent question; I don't know FO. I do know that Hans is a demanding typographer, though, and ConTeXt is capable of quite impressive output.

Bruce

Current Thread
alternative to FO? Bruce D'Arcus - 25 Nov 2004 20:27:20 -0000 Jirka Kosek - 25 Nov 2004 21:25:26 -0000 Bruce D'Arcus - 25 Nov 2004 21:49:20 -0000 <= Jirka Kosek - 26 Nov 2004 08:57:11 -0000 <Possible follow-ups> Pawson, David - 26 Nov 2004 15:11:34 -0000 Michael Kay - 26 Nov 2004 17:05:33 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: alternative to FO?, Jirka Kosek	Thread	Re: alternative to FO?, Jirka Kosek
Re: alternative to FO?, Jirka Kosek	Date	variables vs. modes, Bruce D'Arcus
	Month

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >