Re: [xsl] namespace prefix weirdness

Subject: Re: namespace prefix weirdness
From: Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 10:07:40 -0400

On Aug 19, 2004, at 3:21 AM, Michael Kay wrote:

If there are then processing implications, it seems to me that with
Jeni's simple stylesheet, Saxon ought to generate ...


I'm not sure I understand "ought". As far as conformance to the spec is
concerned, I don't think this is either a "must" or a "should".

If the spec allows this, and since 2.0 is not final, then perhaps it "ought" to be changed? Just a thought ...

Bruce

Current Thread

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: namespace prefix weirdnes, Michael Kay	Thread	RE: namespace prefix weirdnes, Michael Kay
Re: keys and variables, Jeni Tennison	Date	Re: keys and variables, Bruce D'Arcus
	Month