RE: [xsl] standalone="no"

Cart

XML Editor - Download a Free Trial >

See What's New >

Buy Now >

[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

Subject: RE: standalone="no"
From: "Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 16:07:16 +0100

> Should I include 'standalone' in the processing statement? I could
> generate the output without it, but I am hesitant to just "leave it
> blank". Michael Kay's book (1st edition) indicates that it should be
> included in all well formed XML documents.

Some misreading there. It is definitely optional, and as far as I can tell,
rarely used.

Michael Kay

Current Thread
RE: XSLTC, (continued) M. David Peterson - Wed, 12 May 2004 08:01:44 -0600 Mike Ferrando - Wed, 12 May 2004 07:33:45 -0700 (PDT) David Carlisle - Wed, 12 May 2004 15:49:53 +0100 M. David Peterson - Wed, 12 May 2004 08:59:43 -0600 Michael Kay - Wed, 12 May 2004 16:07:16 +0100 <=

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: standalone="no", M. David Peterson	Thread	great problem formating the o, Dionisio Ruiz de Zar
Re: What is the best approach, Julian Voelcker	Date	Re: Concatenating multiple in, David Carlisle
	Month

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >