Subject: Re: xslt 2.0, use case wanted.
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 10:42:31 +0100
|
Surely the point of specifying a starting node would be to operate
on a sub-document so that in your example /part/book/index would
be invisible to the XSLT processing. Your 'equivalent' syntax requires
the whole document to exist in memory.
No, I think that the semantics is taht given a starting node that is not
the root of the document you can still traverse the entire document
using the ancestor axis (or just /) to get back to the top.
So the whole document is there, you just don't start at /.
David
--
http://www.dcarlisle.demon.co.uk/matthew
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
| Current Thread |
David . Pawson - Tue, 6 Apr 2004 04:08:48 -0400 (EDT)
Willink, Ed - Tue, 6 Apr 2004 04:49:59 -0400 (EDT)
Willink, Ed - Tue, 6 Apr 2004 05:21:03 -0400 (EDT)
- David Carlisle - Tue, 6 Apr 2004 05:46:44 -0400 (EDT) <=
- Michael Kay - Tue, 6 Apr 2004 06:21:01 -0400 (EDT)
David . Pawson - Tue, 6 Apr 2004 06:01:28 -0400 (EDT)
David . Pawson - Wed, 7 Apr 2004 04:27:24 -0400 (EDT)
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
| RE: xslt 2.0, use case wanted, Willink, Ed
|
Thread |
RE: xslt 2.0, use case wanted, Michael Kay
|
| RE: xslt 2.0, use case wanted, Willink, Ed
|
Date |
RE: xslt 2.0, use case wanted, David . Pawson
|
|
Month |
|
|