Hi Jacob,

To be more specific, in Moz 1.6 the construct <xsl:choose...> produces
bizarre results. Some other bugs are still residual issues in the current
stable version but I remember this one since not being able to use it in
stylesheets poses serious limits to what you can do.

Cheers
Didier

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jacob Weintraub [mailto:jacobl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 1:42 AM
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re:  Experience with XSLT in IE6?
> 
> Hi Manos,
> 
> Decision was made before I was involved.  I would guess that one reason to
> limit to a single browser was to minimize maintenance and
> testing.  Production version has to be rock solid.  IE over Mozilla choice
> probably due to existing installed base.  I use Mozilla myself and love it
> (though a later post on this topic says its XSLT support is buggy).
> 
> Jacob
> 
> >Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 11:44:52 +0300
> >From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Message-id: <406BD684.40404@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >MIME-version: 1.0
> >Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
> >Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
> >Subject: Re:  Experience with XSLT in IE6?
> >
> >
> >Hi Jacob,
> >
> >Jacob Weintraub wrote:
> >>In a project I'm involved with, we have XML data which we transform to
> >>HTML using XSLT.  The plan is to do the XSLT transform in the browser
> >>client (IE6.0 - we control the clients and can specify the required
> browser).
> >I dont see why you want to limit folks to IE6. Mozilla based browsers
> >handle XML+XSLT just fine. Just send your XML with a style Processing
> >Instruction to the browser. It will work equally well for both browsers.
> >And if you want to control transformations from the client using
> >scripting, that can be done as well.
> >
> >Hope this helps.
> >--
> >Manos Batsis