Subject: RE: Passing arrays as parameters
From: "Michael L" <MichaelL@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 15:28:34 +0100
|
Thanks for the quick replies,
The reason why I wanted to pass in a array is because I want to select a specific data from the XML file.
<Data>
<Foo name="Foo1">
<bar name="bar1">stuff</bar>
<bar name="bar2">stuff</bar>
</Foo>
<Foo name="Foo2">
<bar name="bar1">stuff</bar>
<bar name="bar2">stuff</bar>
</Foo>
<Foo name="Foo3">
<bar name="bar1">stuff</bar>
<bar name="bar2">stuff</bar>
</Foo>
</Data>
I then want to be able to specify what I select from the XML document. I.e I may only want the following data
Foo1("bar1")
Foo3("bar1", "bar2")
I hope the above makes sense.
Thanks once again for the advice.
Cheers
Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 21 April 2004 14:27
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Passing arrays as parameters
A slightly less expensive way to do this is to pass the array in as a
string of XML-like data and then serialize it into a node-set using the
node-set function particular to your processor. Then you can process it
just like any other node-set.
Best of luck!
<M:D/>
If you passed in a string with XML syntax you'd want a parse extension
function not a node-set() (ie the opposite of serialization) Saxon for
example offers such a function.
On the other hand, if called from an API ratherthan from a command line,
most XSLT engines will allow you to pass in a node set as a parameter so
no extension function should be needed.
David
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
| Current Thread |
|
Richard Lewis - Wed, 21 Apr 2004 09:25:43 -0400 (EDT)
Michael Kay - Wed, 21 Apr 2004 19:36:08 -0400 (EDT)
Michael L - Wed, 21 Apr 2004 10:31:02 -0400 (EDT) <=
|
|