Subject: Re: XPath is NOT a functional language
From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 30 Mar 2004 18:12:14 +0100
|
>>>>> "Kenny" == Kenny Akridge <kenny@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Kenny> I'm just curious- what specifically makes you believe that
Kenny> XPath is not functional? And when I say XPath, I am
Kenny> referring to the spec, not an implementation.
Because:
a) You cannot define functions within XPath, and
b) You cannot pass function definitions as arguments to functions.
Either is sufficient.
--
Colin Paul Adams
Preston Lancashire
| Current Thread |
|
Colin Paul Adams - Tue, 30 Mar 2004 12:41:04 -0500 (EST) <=
|
|