Subject: RE: Schema-aware processors - W3C schemas only?
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 00:10:20 GMT
|
> It also has to support the xsl:import-schema declaration and
yes but it can support it with a null set of supported URI's can't it?
> and the validate
if there are no complex types in the static context (as no xsd has been
read in) then validation is pretty much a no-op isn't it? (or rather
comes down to essentially checking that the character cintent is
castable to a specified simple type)
> and type attributes.
Again if there are no complex types around and only primitive xsd simple
types I don't see why this requires XSD validation.
In otherwords is it really clear that a system that accepts a data model
with elements annotated with atomic xsd types such as xsd:double...
coming from some source other than xsd validation can not claim
conformance by supporting schema import with an empty set of available
xsd schema?
David
--
http://www.dcarlisle.demon.co.uk/matthew
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|
Michael Kay - Sat, 28 Feb 2004 18:24:41 -0500 (EST)
|
|