Subject: Re: XSLT vs Perl
From: David Tolpin <dvd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 17:14:07 +0400 (AMT)
|
> From owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Tue Feb 3 17:03:55 2004
> From: bry@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: XSLT vs Perl
> Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 13:39:45 CET
>
> declarative, functional?
XSLT is not declarative, perl is as functional as XSLT.
> conspires to destroy xslt?
I just think that XSLT 2.0 is very close to Perl, Python and Ruby,
just not yet as mature. What's the need for one more language in
this family?
David Tolpin
http://davidashen.net/
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
- RE: Re: XSLT vs Perl, (continued)
- roger . day - Tue, 3 Feb 2004 07:34:39 -0500 (EST)
- bry - Tue, 3 Feb 2004 07:39:56 -0500 (EST)
- David Tolpin - Tue, 3 Feb 2004 08:15:13 -0500 (EST) <=
|
|