Subject: Re: XSLT vs Perl
From: "Dimitre Novatchev" <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 20:45:27 +0100
|
> Michael,
>
> I use many different tools, including XSLT, Lisp and Ruby,
> but not just these tools. I do not feel passionately, or at all,
> that I can design a better language, but it does not mean that I cannot
> see that the language designed by W3C is designed poorly.
>
> I am trying to achieve understanding of causes behind mistakes made
> by the committee during design of XSLT 2.0, in order to be able
> to avoid similar mistakes myself. What concerns me is that these
> mistakes are being made for the last thirty years in many software
> projects.
>
> I'm not discussing persons doing the job, just the job being done.
>
> I see that you are taking it personally, which is sad.
No,
Mike asked specific questions, which you avoid to answer...
Dimitre Novatchev.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
- Re: XSLT vs Perl, (continued)
- Jeni Tennison - Wed, 4 Feb 2004 10:31:28 -0500 (EST)
- David Tolpin - Thu, 5 Feb 2004 00:27:44 -0500 (EST)
- Michael Kay - Thu, 5 Feb 2004 05:01:42 -0500 (EST)
- David Tolpin - Thu, 5 Feb 2004 06:53:18 -0500 (EST)
- Dimitre Novatchev - Thu, 5 Feb 2004 14:34:03 -0500 (EST) <=
- Jeni Tennison - Thu, 5 Feb 2004 12:11:01 -0500 (EST)
- Dimitre Novatchev - Thu, 5 Feb 2004 14:40:33 -0500 (EST)
- J.Pietschmann - Tue, 3 Feb 2004 17:09:29 -0500 (EST)
- Jim Fuller - Tue, 3 Feb 2004 18:05:03 -0500 (EST)
|
|