Re: [xsl] encoding <-> omit-xml-declaration

Cart

XML Editor - Download a Free Trial >

See What's New >

Buy Now >

[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

Subject: Re: encoding <-> omit-xml-declaration
From: Stan Devitt <jsdevitt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 09:25:17 -0500

I would strongly support such a move.

Stan Devitt

Michael Kay wrote:

There is a last call comment (which I consider to be a perfectly

reasonable request) asking us to add US-ASCII to the list. I guess we
will have to use words such as "any encoding supported by the processor
that can be correctly decoded by a UTF-8 decoder", or something to that effect.

XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
RE: encoding <-> omit-xml-declaration, (continued) Michael Kay - Sun, 18 Jan 2004 21:27:49 -0500 (EST) Stan Devitt - Mon, 19 Jan 2004 00:02:20 -0500 (EST) David Carlisle - Mon, 19 Jan 2004 04:19:40 -0500 (EST) Michael Kay - Mon, 19 Jan 2004 08:38:09 -0500 (EST) Stan Devitt - Mon, 19 Jan 2004 09:25:31 -0500 (EST) <= Gary Cornelius - Mon, 19 Jan 2004 05:47:22 -0500 (EST)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: encoding <-> omit-xml-dec, Michael Kay	Thread	Emacs, nxml, xslt-process and, Gary Cornelius
Best practices, SHEIKH Sajjad	Date	RE: Best practices, Jarno . Elovirta
	Month

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >