If you're tied to MSXML 4.0 -- or even to MS XSLT processing more generally
-- you certainly don't need to worry about XSLT 2.0:

http://www.biglist.com/lists/xsl-list/archives/200307/msg00728.html

Ed Blachman
Trellix Corporation

> -----Original Message-----
> From: kakridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:kakridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:21 AM
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE:  XSL Tool
> 
> Just to clarify, I must use the MSXSL 4.0 (parser?).  Still pretty new
> to this.  Not sure if that changes anything.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> Andrew Welch
> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:03 AM
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE:  XSL Tool
> 
> You can use saxon in xselerator, just search for 'saxon' in the help
> index for the settings. 
> 
> > I'm just curious about what tool to use for creating XSL.  I 
> > am currently using Xselerator from MarrowSoft.  It seems that 
> > it only supports XSL v1.0.  I understand there is also XSL 
> > 2.0?  What tool can I get for the $200 range.

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list