On Thursday 20 November 2003 19:13, cknell@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> I tried your solution, which sounds like a better tack than
> the one I proposed, but no <signature> elements were copied
> from related <group> elements.
>

Maybe I misunderstood what Ram was trying to achieve. In the 
output below the signature elements have been replaced by 
following the identifier mapping in the XML. In this example 
they all end up with the signature from the first group. The 
output shown is consistent with my interpretation of the problem 
he was trying to solve. Was something different required?

Kev.

>
> and here is the output:
> =================
> <?xml version = '1.0' encoding = 'UTF-8'?>
> <formatted-xml>
>   <group>
>     <identifier>a</identifier>
>     <signature>signature
>       <identifier>DNSQuery1</identifier>
>       <in>in
>         <long>long</long>
>         <identifier>ant</identifier>
>       </in>
>    </signature>
>   </group>
>
>   <group>
>     <identifier>b</identifier>
>     <identifier>a</identifier>
>     <signature>signature
>       <identifier>DNSQuery1</identifier>
>       <in>in
>         <long>long</long>
>         <identifier>ant</identifier>
>       </in>
>    </signature>
>   </group>
>
>   <group>
>     <identifier>c</identifier>
>     <identifier>b</identifier>
>     <signature>signature
>       <identifier>DNSQuery1</identifier>
>       <in>in
>         <long>long</long>
>         <identifier>ant</identifier>
>       </in>
>    </signature>
>   </group>
> </formatted-xml>
>
> What did I miss in your explanation?


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list