> 
> What do you mean exactly by this? One could imagine for example:
> 
>   1. Register saxon.jar as a COM object and use it in .Net 
> through Interop. However, one has to also register as a COM 
> object the parser used by Saxon (Alfred or Xerces) or try to 
> make some COM wrappers around XPathDocument and 
> XPathNodeIterator. This will require almost no changes to the 
> code of Saxon.
> 
>   2. Porting Saxon to J# ? This (if possible) most probably 
> will require considerable modifications of the code.
> 

I was thinking more along the lines of 1, though I hadn't thought about
the detail of what interfaces needed to be registered/wrapped. If
someone wants to try 2 they are welcome though I think it would be
better to wait until Saxon 7.x is "finished".

Michael Kay


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list