I apologize !!! It was a stupid mistake in my xsl.
Thanks for your time.


--- David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Looks right.
> You'll need to post a slightly less mininimal xsl
> without the ...
> so we can run it and compare output.
> David
> 
> 
> -- 
> http://www.dcarlisle.demon.co.uk/matthew
> 
>
________________________________________________________________________
> This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star
> Internet. The
> service is powered by MessageLabs. For more
> information on a proactive
> anti-virus service working around the clock, around
> the globe, visit:
> http://www.star.net.uk
>
________________________________________________________________________
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive: 
> http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> 


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list