> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dipesh Khakhkhar

>
> Well as I said it as a discrepancy, i mean even if the timing
> shown on the
> Windows 2000 server was less, it took longer than on the windows
> XP even if

No, it didn't... 2198 + 7.545 + 18.70 + 4379 is more than 27.01 + 8.515

> server was having more memory.
>
> The CPU Speed of the two machine are
>
> Windows XP : Single Processor of 800 Mhz.
>
> Windows 2000 server: Dual Processor each of 500 Mhz.
>
> So even everything is more configuration wise why it took long
> time (whereas

No, it's not... unless there's automatic parallel processing. If only 1 of
the 2 CPUs is used on the server, however...

> it didn't showed the correct time with -t command in MSXSL).
>

And that's the very same version of MSXSL? (Besides this: how do you *know*
what the correct time is?)


Greetz,

Andreas Delmelle


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list