[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

Subject: Re: Re: [meta] why post? [was] CSS
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 16:47:48 +0100

Mike Haarman says that Mike Brown  wrote

> point. It seemed like an innocuous suggestion, to me, since even if I had not
> correctly guessed what the original poster meant, making the suggestion
> to use xsl:comment to generate comments was sure to benefit *somebody*.
> It's becoming an increasingly rare event when I feel like helping anyone on
> this list anymore.

although it hasn't reached here yet (so i'm not sure of the full context
of the quote)

Sorry if my followup caused offence.

I think after a week of threads on getting data out or putting data in
to CDATA sections, I felt moved to comment adversely on a suggestion to
hide some more document content:-) Probably my email was too terse (not
for the first time...)


David

________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread
  • Re: CSS, (continued)
        • David Carlisle - Mon, 4 Aug 2003 09:55:27 -0400 (EDT)
        • Jarkko Moilanen - Tue, 5 Aug 2003 00:35:11 -0400 (EDT)
        • Mike Brown - Tue, 5 Aug 2003 03:58:40 -0400 (EDT)
        • Mike Haarman - Tue, 5 Aug 2003 11:16:25 -0400 (EDT)
        • David Carlisle - Tue, 5 Aug 2003 11:48:43 -0400 (EDT) <=
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member