Subject: RE: advice on node-set fallback needed
From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 15:30:28 +0200
|
Thanks!
--
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Michael Kay
> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 3:05 PM
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: advice on node-set fallback needed
>
>
> XSLT 1.0 allows you to specify version on the xsl:stylesheet element, or
> xsl:version on a literal result element. Unfortunately there is no way
> of scoping the version to less than a whole stylesheet module unless you
> have a convenient LRE. This anomaly is fixed in 2.0, but that's too late
> for you. Putting version="2.0" on xsl:value-of should be an error under
> 1.0, unless there's a version="2.0" on the xsl:stylesheet, in which case
> its pointless!
>
> Michael Kay
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> > Julian Reschke
> > Sent: 19 August 2003 09:20
> > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: advice on node-set fallback needed
> >
> >
> > Thanks Mike.
> >
> > > Are you saying MSXML4 gives you a compile-time error for a path
> > > expression that misuses an RTF?
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > > The XSLT 1.0 spec is very unspecific about which errors are
> > > compile-time errors and which are run-time. The spec merely
> > says that
> > > this operation "is not permitted". But you should be able
> > to get it to
> > > compile by using forwards-compatible mode, which you can invoke by
> > > setting version="2.0" (or any value other than 1.0).
> >
> > So I'm now trying:
> >
> > <xsl:choose>
> > <xsl:when test="function-available('exsl:node-set')">
> > <xsl:text>exsl: </xsl:text><xsl:value-of
> > select="name(exsl:node-set($test)/node())" />
> > </xsl:when>
> > <xsl:when test="function-available('msxsl:node-set')">
> > <xsl:text>msxsl: </xsl:text><xsl:value-of
> > select="name(msxsl:node-set($test)/node())" />
> > </xsl:when>
> > <xsl:otherwise>
> > <xsl:text>(none): </xsl:text><xsl:value-of
> > version="2.0" select="name($test/node())" />
> > </xsl:otherwise>
> > </xsl:choose>
> >
> > However this breaks execution in Saxon 6.5.3 and MSXML completely:
> >
> > (MSXML3 and MSXML4)
> >
> > Error occurred while compiling stylesheet 'test.xslt'.
> >
> > Code: 0x80004005
> > Attribute 'version' is invalid on 'xsl:value-of'.
> >
> > (Saxon)
> >
> > Attribute version is not allowed on this element
> > Transformation failed: Failed to compile stylesheet. 1 error detected.
> >
> >
> > Using xsl:version instead of version yields:
> >
> > (MSXML3)
> >
> > Works.
> >
> > (MSXML4)
> >
> > Error occurred while compiling stylesheet 'test.xslt'.
> >
> > Code: 0x80004005
> > Expression must evaluate to a node-set.
> >
> > name(-->$test<--/node())
> >
> > (Saxon)
> >
> > Attribute xsl:version is not allowed on this element
> > Transformation failed: Failed to compile stylesheet. 1 error detected.
> >
> >
> > What *does* seem to work is setting version="2.0" on the
> > stylesheet element itself. However I'm a bit concerned that
> > this will instruct an XSLT 2.0 in a non-XSLT-1.0 compatible manner.
> >
> > However, this:
> >
> > <xsl:choose>
> > <xsl:when test="function-available('exsl:node-set')">
> > <xsl:text>exsl: </xsl:text><xsl:value-of
> > select="name(exsl:node-set($test)/node())" />
> > </xsl:when>
> > <xsl:when test="function-available('msxsl:node-set')">
> > <xsl:text>msxsl: </xsl:text><xsl:value-of
> > select="name(msxsl:node-set($test)/node())" />
> > </xsl:when>
> > <xsl:when test="system-property('xsl:version') >= 2.0">
> > <xsl:text>(XSLT2.0): </xsl:text><xsl:value-of
> > version="2.0" select="name($test/node())" />
> > </xsl:when>
> > <xsl:otherwise>
> > <xsl:text>no way</xsl:text>
> > </xsl:otherwise>
> > </xsl:choose>
> >
> > seems to work with all 1.0 processors I tried, and should
> > also work on an XSLT-2.0 processor without exslt:node-set(), right?
> >
> > > The rules for what a 2.0 processor should do when given a
> > stylesheet
> > > that says version="1.0" have not fully stabilised, but the next
> > > version of the spec is likely to say that the processor
> > should give a
> > > warning about possible incompatibilities, and then execute the
> > > stylesheet in backwards-compatible mode. It should not
> > disallow use of
> > > 2.0 features just because the stylesheet says
> > version="1.0". In this
> > > case, however, your stylesheet is using a 2.0 feature so it
> > should say
> > > version="2.0".
> > >
> > > Michael Kay
> >
> > Thank for the help,
> >
> > Julian
> >
> > --
> > <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
> >
> >
> > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> >
>
>
> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|