[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Chris,
Try select="items/item[not(preceding-sibling::* [name=current()/name and type = current()/type and status = current()/status])]" The problem with your statement is it's testing true if there no corresponding values on any preceding siblings, whereas you want it to be true only if there's a preceding sibling with all corresponding values. I hope that works for you-- Cheers, Wendell At 03:43 PM 7/10/2003, you wrote: I'm trying to create a node set that only contains different nodes. The problem I'm running into is I seem to be losing nodes that I shouldn't. ====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ====================================================================== XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|

Cart



