Subject: Re: Precedence of template rules on xsl:import
From: "Marcus Andersson" <marcan@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 15:33:35 +0200
|
Well, I was looking for an alternative to what I was doing and David and Jeni provided me with it (thnx a lot by the way). Another alternative that I found out myself the same second I pushed the send button was to use named templates.But the include does it for now...
/Marcus
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 2:59 PM
Subject: RE: Precedence of template rules on xsl:import
> > But there is a but
> > here, namely that the main stylesheet will be generated from
> > a config file so I want that the order of the imports
> > shouldn't matter.
>
> But the XSLT specification says that the order of imports does matter,
> and if you are generating XSLT then I'm afraid you have to live with the
> spec as written.
>
> Michael Kay
>
>
> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>
>
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
Michael Kay - Fri, 4 Jul 2003 08:58:52 -0400 (EDT)
- Marcus Andersson - Fri, 4 Jul 2003 09:33:00 -0400 (EDT) <=
|
|