> From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of J.Pietschmann
> Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2003 10:15 PM
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject:  New element proposed for XSLT 2.5 (was: xsl:copy-of O.K.
> on RTF...)
> 
> 
> William Reilly wrote:
> > Many thanks, Mike, for helping confirm some assumptions.
> >  
> > Yes, XSLT 2 ought to help re: RTF & Etc.
> > (Your mentioning of looking out for xsl:key and recursion gives 
> me more food for thought...)
> 
> Rumor has that there is a proposal to include an element
>    xsl:kay
> into the bugfix XSLT release after 2.0 is out. If something
> goes wrong, just insert it into a suspect place and you'll
> get detailed explanations what was wrong, how to correct it
> and how to extend the code to solve your original task more
> efficiently.
> Note that XSLT 2.5 conformant processors are not required to
> implement this  element.

Note that there'll be an xsl:tennison alias for the element.

--
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760 


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list