Subject: RE: XPath: following sibling/cousin n-times removed??
From: "Lars Huttar" <lars_huttar@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 16:28:29 -0500
|
Never mind...
I decided to use
test="generate-id(.) = generate-id(ancestor::llcd:word//llcd:morpheme[1])"
which of course tells whether the current morpheme is the first in the
current word, instead of the last, which is just as useful in this situation.
And I think it's more efficient than what I had before. It's certainly
shorter and seems clearer. (Other ideas are still welcome though.)
Lars
> My current test is:
> "following::llcd:morpheme[1][generate-id(ancestor::llcd:word) =
> generate-id(current()/ancestor::llcd:word[1])]"
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|