----- Original Message -----
From: "Mitch Amiano" <mitch.amiano@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > If I may speak for Dave Pawson, the appendices in his XSL FO book are
> > also generated from the XML for the XSL 1.0 Recommendation.
>
>
> Interesting. Actually, I'd consider the "generate sources from domain profile"
pattern (if I give that name to the situation I described) somewhat different
than the document generation case, which I'd consider more.... normal (for lack
of a better word). But perhaps the field is converging to the extent that one
can no longer draw an absolute distinction?
Converging on an emanent truth of markup: that any character-based data
representation may profitably be considered a document. A source-code file is
merely a document with particularly rigorous, repetitive and error-prone
syntactic and grammatical requirements. The application of XSLT to code
generation is perfectly analagous to its application over *documents*. Let
markup manage the semantic domain and allow stylesheets to manage syntactic,
grammatical or formatting details.
Mike
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
Tony Graham - Mon, 12 May 2003 06:59:51 -0400 (EDT)
- G. Ken Holman - Mon, 12 May 2003 08:20:41 -0400 (EDT)
- Message not available
- Mitch Amiano - Thu, 15 May 2003 09:04:02 -0400 (EDT)
- Mike Haarman - Fri, 16 May 2003 11:24:50 -0400 (EDT) <=
Dion Houston - Fri, 9 May 2003 16:13:39 -0400 (EDT)
me - Fri, 9 May 2003 16:36:56 -0400 (EDT)
Passin, Tom - Fri, 9 May 2003 16:58:55 -0400 (EDT)
|
|