Re: [xsl] document() access. The combinations

Cart

XML Editor - Download a Free Trial >

See What's New >

Buy Now >

[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

Subject: Re: document() access. The combinations
From: Mitch Amiano <mitch.amiano@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 07:20:28 -0400

I'm not a master of ieft specs either, but 1738 appears to be quite agnostic on the question. file: is system specific, so it just depends on what the tool implements.

Perhaps file: resolution should attempt to use the smb protocol, but it doesn't sound like an obvious design decision, at least not when 1738 was written.

- Mitch

David.Pawson@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

If I were a master at spec interpretation I'd do it. I'm not. I'm seeking help. but good suggestion.

e.g. who knows how

file://\\church\other-path

relates to http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1738.txt ?

UNC's are not mentioned.
More to come.
regards DaveP

XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread

Re: document() access. The combinations, (continued)
- David . Pawson - Thu, 1 May 2003 09:27:42 -0400 (EDT)
  - Mitch Amiano - Fri, 2 May 2003 07:19:05 -0400 (EDT) <=
- Américo Albuquerque - Fri, 2 May 2003 06:31:29 -0400 (EDT)
  - J.Pietschmann - Fri, 2 May 2003 15:14:07 -0400 (EDT)
- me - Fri, 2 May 2003 16:04:12 -0400 (EDT)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: document() access. The co, David . Pawson	Thread	document() access. The combin, Américo Albuquerque
document() access. The combin, Américo Albuquerque	Date	RE: Re: Re: Transform XML, cknell
	Month

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >