[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
At 09:28 16/05/2003 +0100, you wrote:
> I still contend that type doesn't belong in XSLT, Dave, Inadvertently, I am sure, you omitted what Kurt went on to say. I quote it here for your convenience: >I still contend that type doesn't belong in XSLT, but if it is in there, it >should make processes more efficient, not less. If type needs to be there, >then all of XSD should be supported, such that an XSLT function can return >an object of complex type Foo. Would you be happy if the XSLT WG went on to heed Kurt's second option and implemented all of XSD Schema? Andrew Watt XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|

Cart



