[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
From: "Passin, Tom" <tpassin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: RE: using node fragments Other replies to your question have pointed out that you need to either use a node-set() extension or do the transform in two passes. However, if you could influence the source xml to get rid of the "in" after the value of the COLWIDTH, then you could avoid both node-set() and two passes. If there is still some need for specifying "in", it could be done by using another attribute instead. thanks. Yes, I can influence the data to some extent, I can submit a change request to the committee that decides these thing and then if they agree, in about 6-9 months they will change the data in the next revision! Woody XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|

Cart



