[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
I just thought I'd provide a variation. I can't make any performance
claims vs. a sort in a for-each. Maybe someone else knows.
<xsl:template match="/"> <xsl:apply-templates select="//orange"> <xsl:sort data-type="number" order="descending" select="string-length(.)"/> </xsl:apply-templates> </xsl:template> <xsl:template match="orange">
<xsl:if test="position()=1">
<LongString type="{name()}" string-length="{string-length(.)}">
<xsl:value-of select="."/>
</LongString>
</xsl:if>
</xsl:template>-rick At 10:35 PM 3/11/03 +0100, you wrote: hi!
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|

Cart



