>Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 10:40:01 +0100
From: Daniel Veillard <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re:  perl and xslt
>
>On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 11:32:59PM -0600, cameron wrote:
>> Can someone recommend a good perl module for XSL transformations other
>> than LibXSLT.  I need one that is pure perl so that it is
>> platform-independent.
>
>  Hum, libxslt is very portable. What platform did you get problems
>with ? perl is C code, so is libxml2/libxslt, and I doubt there is
>much more platform constraints on my side than on perl side.

I shoud have been more specific about my situation, platform-independant isn't 
exactly what I meant.  My personal server is a Linux box which I run 
XML::LibXSLT on without a problem, but I also rent web space on a Solaris 
server which I don't have shell access to and can't compile the C for it 
which is why I need a pure perl module.  LibXSLT apparently requires 
LibXML::Common::Common.so to run which is my limitation (the ELF data format 
Solaris requires is different than Linux so I can't simply build it on my 
end, unless this is a mistake or there is a way around it that I don't know 
about.)

I've toyed with XML-XSLT, but it's slow and is not a full implementation of 
the W3M XSLT specification.

>Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 10:28:25 -0000
From: "Peter Gibbons-BU" <peter.gibbons.01@xxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: RE:  perl and xslt
>
>A good alternative to consider is sablotron.  Its available at
>www.gingerall.com.  I think its now r1.0 compliant.  It can run on the
>command line as sabcmd or via a perl module.

I haven't tried sablotron.  Does the perl module require any binaries to run 
like I mentioned above with LibXML?

--
Cameron

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list