Well I'd have to go back to discussions going on about that time but if
I remember correctly there was a particularly angst-ridden thread about
xpath 2.0, xslt 2.0, PSVIs and so forth at the time and the fear and
loathing inspired me to a bit of levity, as it often does.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andrew Watt
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 1:53 PM
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: the future (was RE:  Locating Things Relative to
Location of Style Sheet)

At 17:40 06/12/2002 +0100, you wrote:
>Good news everybody!
>
>I just asked the magic 8-ball Santa (http://www.santashaker.com/) if
>xpath 2.0 will be widely adopted and he said "No"
>He also said: "I'm Santa and I'm Frosty." So that may not be a good
sign
>though.

Bryan,

Did the esteemed Santa give any indication of why he had reached that 
conclusion about XPath 2.0?

Andrew Watt



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list