On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, bryan wrote:

> 
> http://fxsl.sourceforge.net/
> http://www.exslt.org/
> 
> these are complimentary. Fxsl implements functions in xslt, exslt
> defines a list of functions and implementation guidelines so that one
> can have extention functions not otherwise in the core. Saxon and if I
> remember correctly Xalan both implement the exslt core functions. 

having just looked at the FXSL sourceforge site, i'm intrigued by
the fact that there are three different .zip files; for MS, Saxon
and Xalan, respectively.

i'm just about to take a look at FXSL, but is there some reason
that functions written in XSLT would need to be processor
dependent?  curious.

rday



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list