Subject: RE: is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transformation)
From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 12:55:14 -0000
|
> And one more time I disagree with this. The problem is not as bad as
> you make it out. You do not need to say that the input must be
> derived from some source XML document. You simply need to state that
> when the input is derived directly from a source XML document, then
> the data model is precisely specified.
I have actually been in favour of defining one specific route from a
source XML document to a data model object that all processors must
support, but I haven't persuaded my colleagues to accept the principle,
let alone the details of what that route should be.
Michael Kay
Software AG
home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx
work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|
Wendell Piez - Tue, 4 Feb 2003 11:49:49 -0500 (EST)
S Woodside - Tue, 4 Feb 2003 12:53:29 -0500 (EST)
|
|