Subject: RE: The Perils of Sudden Type-Safety in XPath 2.0
From: "bryan" <bry@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 19:44:05 +0100
|
>Now if you have a schema specified but you do not want the xslt
>processor to pay attention to it, you will probably be out of luck, as
>best I can tell from recent posts on this.
Right. I suppose one of the ugly workarounds we will see in the future
will involve a dom (or other type of processable xml) to be processed
through a schema, and a dom to be processed through an xslt, even though
both doms are in fact loading the same xml.
Does this seem like a good guess?
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
Passin, Tom - Tue, 18 Feb 2003 13:24:51 -0500 (EST)
- bryan - Tue, 18 Feb 2003 13:44:24 -0500 (EST) <=
- Gunther Schadow - Tue, 18 Feb 2003 14:23:24 -0500 (EST)
- bryan - Wed, 19 Feb 2003 04:23:01 -0500 (EST)
- Kurt Cagle - Wed, 19 Feb 2003 04:58:11 -0500 (EST)
Martinez, Brian - Tue, 18 Feb 2003 13:37:47 -0500 (EST)
|
|
Cart
