Subject: RE: is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transformation)
From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 17:26:07 -0000
|
> If it's true that $s rules the development of the specs (XSLT
> etc) more
> than anything else, then that's a very sad state of affairs IMHO.
>
Actually it's probably just as well that participating in the standards
process is so expensive (more in time and expenses than in W3C
membership fees, incidentally). If more people took part, the process
would take even longer, and the specs would be even more complicated.
But since participation does take a lot of time and effort, I think it's
inevitable that the process is biased towards the views of the people
who invest that time and effort.
Michael Kay
Software AG
home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx
work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
- [design question], (continued)
- TP - Tue, 4 Feb 2003 09:35:22 -0500 (EST)
- TP - Wed, 5 Feb 2003 08:57:02 -0500 (EST)
- Jeni Tennison - Wed, 5 Feb 2003 09:28:00 -0500 (EST)
- Tobias Reif - Tue, 4 Feb 2003 09:49:27 -0500 (EST)
- Michael Kay - Tue, 4 Feb 2003 12:25:09 -0500 (EST) <=
- Jeff Kenton - Tue, 4 Feb 2003 12:38:56 -0500 (EST)
- Tobias Reif - Tue, 4 Feb 2003 13:30:16 -0500 (EST)
- David Carlisle - Tue, 4 Feb 2003 09:52:58 -0500 (EST)
- Michael Kay - Tue, 4 Feb 2003 12:21:17 -0500 (EST)
|
|
Cart
