--- cknell@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Do I understand that you have an element which will
> contain child elements, each of which you wish to
> use as the heading values for a table?
> 
> If that is right, is it also correct that you will
> have one or more instances of the parent element,
> but that the child elements are optional? That is to
> say that all possible child elements will not
> necessarily appear in all instances of the parent
> element.
> 
> If these things are true, then we have two problems
> to solve:
> 1) collect all possible values for column names
> 2) construct a table with one column for each column
> name
> 
> Is this correct?
> -- 
> Charles Knell
> cknell@xxxxxxxxxx - email

Charles, that is correct. I can implement it without
arrays...but the solution is very large and not very
elegant. I was hoping xsl provide a more elegant way.

Imrran

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list