Subject: Re: XSL-FO versus PostScript
From: Joseph Kesselman <keshlam@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 09:30:15 -0500
|
Just a quick observation: If you really prefer to think in terms of
generating TeX rather than XSL-FO, IBM published a technology
demonstration quite some time ago which consisted of a XML equivalent
syntax for LaTeX and a postprocessor that would convert this into standard
LaTeX markup. It might still be available from the alphaWorks website.
______________________________________
Joe Kesselman, IBM Next-Generation Web Technologies:
XML, XSL and more. "may'ron DaroQbe'chugh vaj bIrIQbej"
("Put down the squeezebox and nobody gets hurt.")
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
Joseph Kesselman - Fri, 28 Feb 2003 09:28:10 -0500 (EST) <=
- Zack Brown - Fri, 28 Feb 2003 10:38:43 -0500 (EST)
- Zack Brown - Fri, 28 Feb 2003 10:43:33 -0500 (EST)
|
|