Subject: RE: Re: Reference to variable cannot be resolved.
From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 11:25:03 -0000
|
> >
> > It's a bicycle-shed issue. The committee spent hours wrangling and
> > agreed on a messy compromise that satisfies no-one.
>
> Why, for what pressing reason, had this to be put in the
> specification?
>
> What are the use-cases, whose solution depends significantly
> on this feature?
Some people regard the ability to have two variables with the same name
as a feature that needs to be justified.
Some people regard the inability to have two variables with the same
name as a restriction that needs to be justified.
The latter group won.
Michael Kay
Software AG
home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx
work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|