> Hmm... in place of "[generate-id() = generate-id( 
> current())]", wouldn't "[self::current()]" work just as well? 
>  Or am I missing something?
> 

I'm not sure what you're missing, but you're trying to make the language
up as you go along. An axis specifier such as "self::" is always
followed by a NodeTest, and a function call can never be a NodeTest.

Michael Kay
Software AG
home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx
work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list