On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 15:35, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 03:04:46PM +0100, Eric van der Vlist wrote:
> > For those of you who read French, I came to the same (controversial)
> > conclusion on a real world case recently on XMLfr:
> 
>   The problem is if you want to pass a bit more structure. 

Yes, my example was easy enough. OTH, it's very often the case and then,
why would we use something more complex?

> That ought
> to be possible in an XSLT/XML framework (and without requiring hundred
> of pages of underlying specifications :-)

Sure! 

Eric
-- 
See you in Baltimore.
                                    http://www.xmlconference.org/xmlusa/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org            http://dyomedea.com
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list