Subject: Re: fallback, saxon and MSXSL
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 12:18:05 +0100
|
> Do I have to use function-available instead?
yes
xsl:fallback inside an element is for the case when the processor does
not know how to process that element (because it's an extension or from
a later version of xslt) in your case the element is xsl:for-each
so saxon will ignore the fallback as it understands for-each.
The fact that it can't execute the xpath expression in the select
expression is a different issue and generates an xpath error not
something that is ever avoided by xsl:fallback.
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
- fallback, saxon and MSXSL
- DPawson - Wed, 9 Oct 2002 05:49:17 -0400 (EDT)
- David Carlisle - Wed, 9 Oct 2002 07:15:46 -0400 (EDT) <=
- Michael Kay - Wed, 9 Oct 2002 10:19:14 -0400 (EDT)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- DPawson - Wed, 9 Oct 2002 06:52:06 -0400 (EDT)
- DPawson - Wed, 9 Oct 2002 08:02:29 -0400 (EDT)
|
|