[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
bryan wrote:
I was wondering if anyone had looked at fxt http://www.informatik.uni-trier.de/~aberlea/Fxt/userGuide.html#fxt_actio ns and if they had any comments, to me it seemed like no improvement on xslt. Does anyone see something it does better, or stuff it does which might be better used in xslt 2.0? A quick look at that spec says there's almost nothing it does that XSLT can't do (except, perhaps, its use of a stack). There are lots of things XSLT can do that FXT can't, especially XSLT/XPath 2.0. My question is: why would anyone switch? I don't even see anything that's compelling enough to add to XSLT. Does anybody who's looked at it in more detail come to a different conclusion?
-- -------------------------- Jeff Kenton DataPower Technology, Inc. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|

Cart



